Thursday, February 4, 2021

The Morning: Biden’s strategy

Why he isn't more enthusiastic about bipartisan talks.

Good morning. Here’s why Joe Biden isn’t more enthusiastic about bipartisan virus talks.

Vice President Kamala Harris, President Biden and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer in the Oval Office.Stefani Reynolds for The New York Times

The Lucy theory of politics

To understand the back and forth over President Biden’s coronavirus relief bill, it helps to look back at a little history.

In Bill Clinton’s first weeks as president, he pushed for legislation meant to reduce the deficit, bring down interest rates and spark the economy. It received no votes from Republicans in the House or the Senate and passed only when Vice President Al Gore broke a 50-50 Senate tie.

In Barack Obama’s first weeks as president, he pushed for legislation to halt the financial crisis and revive the economy. It received no votes from House Republicans and only three from Senate Republicans, one of whom (Arlen Specter) soon switched parties.

This week, when I first saw the Biden administration’s unenthusiastic reaction to a coronavirus proposal from Senate Republicans, I was confused. Biden views himself as a dealmaker, and a president typically benefits from forging a bipartisan compromise.

So why isn’t Biden pursuing a two-step strategy — first pouring himself into a bipartisan deal and then following up with a Democratic bill that fills in the pieces he thinks were missing? Why does he instead seem to be leaning toward a single bill that would need only Democratic support to pass?

The answer has a lot to do with history: For decades, congressional Republicans have opposed — almost unanimously — any top priority of an incoming Democratic president. Biden and his aides believe they will be playing Charlie Brown to a Republican Lucy if they imagine this time will be different.

The parties aren’t the same

Democrats, of course, also tend to oppose Republican presidents’ policies and often try to obstruct them. But on the question of legislative compromise, there really has been a recent difference between the parties. (Which can be a difficult thing for us journalists to acknowledge: We’re more comfortable portraying the parties as mirror images of each other.)

In 2001, George W. Bush’s tax cut was supported by 12 Democrats in the Senate and 28 in the House. His education bill also received significant Democratic support, as did multiple virus relief bills during Donald Trump’s presidency. Some Democrats saw these bills as opportunities to win policy concessions.

Republicans have a taken different tack. Perhaps the clearest example is Obamacare, the final version of which received no Republican votes even though it included conservative ideas and Obama was eager to include more in exchange for Republican support. But top Republicans, led by Senator Mitch McConnell, thought that any support of the bill would strengthen Obama and weaken them.

“It’s either bipartisan or it isn’t,” McConnell told The Times in 2010, explaining the strategy.

Counting to 10

On the surface, this time seems different, given that 10 Republican senators went to the White House on Monday to talk with Biden about a compromise virus bill. But that meeting may have been as much about show, on both sides, as substance.

Senator Susan Collins and other Republican senators after a meeting with President Biden on Monday.Doug Mills/The New York Times

Of the 10 Republicans, a few — like Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Mitt Romney — have occasionally sided with Democrats on a major issue. Others, however, have not — including Jerry Moran of Kansas, Mike Rounds of South Dakota and Todd Young of Indiana. And Biden would need at least 10 Republican votes to overcome a filibuster. With any fewer, he would be back to pursuing the same 51-vote strategy (known as reconciliation) he now seems to be pursuing.

Democrats’ central fear is a repeat of Obamacare, in which months of negotiation in 2009 nonetheless ended without Republican support. Biden would have then wasted his first months in office — and the country would have gone without additional money for vaccination, virus testing, unemployment insurance and more.

As Carl Hulse, The Times’s chief Washington correspondent, told me: “Democrats, including many now in the White House, remember 2009 very clearly, and they fear being strung along for months only to come away empty-handed. That’s not to say Republicans aren’t bargaining in good faith, but holding that 10 together could be difficult.”

Biden himself has made the same point in private conversations. “He said, basically, ‘I don’t want to go down the path we went down in 2009, when we negotiated for eight months and still didn’t have a product,’” Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia said on “Morning Joe” yesterday.

One more point: Neither side is committing itself to a strategy yet. If Democrats proceed with the reconciliation approach, they and Republicans can continue negotiating over the substance of the bill. Bush used reconciliation for his 2001 tax cut and still received 40 votes from congressional Democrats in the end.

The latest: Biden met with congressional Democrats at the White House yesterday. He said he was open to restricting eligibility for his proposed $1,400-per-person checks but not to reducing the maximum amount. “I’m not going to start my administration by breaking a promise to people,” Biden reportedly said.


Covid-19 patients receiving oxygen outside a hospital in Lagos, Nigeria.Seun Sanni/Reuters
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia.Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times
  • The House will vote today on whether to strip Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of two committee seats. Before her election, Greene endorsed calls to execute Democratic politicians and spread conspiracy theories.
  • Representative Kevin McCarthy, the House Republican leader, declined to revoke Greene’s assignments on his own.
  • House Republicans voted in a secret ballot to keep Representative Liz Cheney, the No. 3 Republican, in her leadership position. Cheney voted to impeach President Donald Trump last month.

A Morning Read: Just because an apartment costs tens of millions of dollars, that doesn’t mean it’s free from leaking or creaking. Welcome to life in a supertall tower.

From Opinion: Europe’s vaccine rollout has been even slower than the U.S.’s. The French journalist Sylvie Kauffmann explains.

Lives Lived: Barry Lewis’s walking tours of New York City made him a local celebrity. He detested academic jargon: The Jefferson Market Library, he would explain, was a punk structure for its time; the Ford Foundation building was “so purely reductionist as to be practically Zen.” Lewis died at 75.

This newsletter is free, but you can go deeper into the stories we highlight each morning with a subscription to The Times. Please consider becoming a subscriber today.


Britney Spears in Las Vegas in 2018.Steve Marcus/Las Vegas Sun, via Associated Press

The #FreeBritney movement

Britney Spears is in an unusual position, and not just because she’s a famous pop star. Since 2008 — when she was 26 and in the midst of a public breakdown that dominated the tabloids — she has been in a conservatorship, a complex legal arrangement usually reserved for people who are old or sick.

As a result, she cannot make many decisions — personal or financial, including mundane purchases, like a Starbucks coffee — without the oversight of guardians appointed by the court. One of them is her father, James Spears.

The singer’s fans have grown increasingly critical of the restrictions, using the hashtag #FreeBritney. They point out that Spears is behaving like a functioning adult: She has toured, released albums, appeared on television and performed a greatest hits show in Las Vegas. Some fans have taken to YouTube and Instagram, arguing that the pop star is exploited.

Spears, who’s 39, had rarely commented until last year, when she began seeking substantial changes in court. In November, a judge declined her request to remove her father as the head of her estate, although future hearings are likely.

For more: A New York Times documentary looks at the dispute and at Spears’s life. You can watch it tomorrow, at 10 p.m. Eastern on FX, or stream it on Hulu.


Con Poulos for The New York Times. Food Stylist: Simon Andrews.

This buttery kimchi shrimp is perfect for a busy weeknight.


“Earwig and the Witch,” by Studio Ghibli, follows a strong-willed orphan who is taken in by a witch. The Times critic Maya Phillips writes a mixed review.


The pangram from yesterday’s Spelling Bee was telepathy. Today’s puzzle is above — or you can play online.

Here’s today’s Mini Crossword, and a clue: Long, boring job (four letters).

And attention quiz fans: You have until noon Eastern today to submit a question for this week’s News Quiz.

Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David

P.S. The word “supertroll” — from a Thomas Friedman column about Vladimir Putin — appeared for the first time in The Times this week.

Today’s episode of “The Daily” is about Myanmar. On the latest “Sway,” the billionaire Mark Cuban discusses vaccines and impeachment.

Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti and Sanam Yar contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

The Morning Briefing newsletter is now The Morning newsletter. You received this email because you signed up for the newsletter from The New York Times, or as part of your New York Times account.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:


Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments:

Post a Comment